Immigrants from Bahamas vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Bahamas
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Bahamas

Pima

Tragic
Poor
1,107
SOCIAL INDEX
8.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
322nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Immigrants from Bahamas Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,928,637 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Bahamas communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.707. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bahamas within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.972% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bahamas corresponds to an increase of 971.9 Pima.
Immigrants from Bahamas Integration in Pima Communities

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,193 compared to $30,644, a difference of 21.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,177 compared to $73,365, a difference of 13.4%), and median household income ($71,349 compared to $63,262, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 0.28%), median female earnings ($35,027 compared to $35,326, a difference of 0.85%), and median earnings ($39,861 compared to $38,285, a difference of 4.1%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Pima Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BahamasPima
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,193
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,732
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Tragic
$71,349
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,861
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,176
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,027
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,793
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,910
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,177
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,174
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Exceptional
21.1%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 83.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 65.5%), and family poverty (11.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 64.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 20.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 20.9%), and single father poverty (18.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 22.5%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BahamasPima
Poverty
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.3%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.1%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
19.0%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 125.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 90.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 86.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 7.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.1%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BahamasPima
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
11.7%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.5%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BahamasPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.0%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.5%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.2%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 71.9%), births to unmarried women (40.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 28.3%), and married-couple households (41.7% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.9%), family households (63.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.7%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BahamasPima
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.3%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.7%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.9%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.1%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 49.7%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 42.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.84%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 26.6%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BahamasPima
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.5%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
7.9%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (33.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 43.5%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 39.5%), and associate's degree (42.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.11%), 7th grade (95.9% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.39%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BahamasPima
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Poor
97.3%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Poor
94.6%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.2%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.2%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.3%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 62.6%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 37.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.2%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BahamasPima
Disability
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Tragic
2.8%