Immigrants from Latin America vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,931,650 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.306. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to a decrease of 2.7 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,823 compared to $30,644, a difference of 20.2%), median household income ($75,420 compared to $63,262, a difference of 19.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,219 compared to $73,365, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,307 compared to $35,326, a difference of 0.050%), householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $51,503, a difference of 0.23%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $82,821, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 58.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 58.2%), and family poverty (11.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 11.0%), single mother poverty (32.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 19.0%), and receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 123.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 96.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 82.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 49.6%), births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 38.6%), and married-couple households (44.7% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.0%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and single mother households (7.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 36.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 55.4%), bachelor's degree (30.1% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 29.5%), and associate's degree (37.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 0.32%), 12th grade, no diploma (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and high school diploma (82.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 51.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 40.5%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.9%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.4%).