Immigrants from Philippines vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Philippines
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Philippines

Pima

Average
Poor
6,107
SOCIAL INDEX
58.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
163rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Immigrants from Philippines Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,637,163 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Philippines communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.484. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Philippines corresponds to a decrease of 3.4 Pima.
Immigrants from Philippines Integration in Pima Communities

Immigrants from Philippines vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Pima communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,899 compared to $63,262, a difference of 48.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,471 compared to $73,365, a difference of 47.8%), and per capita income ($44,000 compared to $30,644, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,930 compared to $51,503, a difference of 12.5%), median female earnings ($41,114 compared to $35,326, a difference of 16.4%), and wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 16.9%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Pima Income
Income MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesPima
Per Capita Income
Average
$44,000
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,288
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,899
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,266
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,809
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,114
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,930
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,910
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,471
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,161
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Exceptional
21.1%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 138.5%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 128.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 110.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 5.1%), single mother poverty (26.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 45.8%), and single female poverty (18.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 63.3%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesPima
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.0%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.6%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.0%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.5%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.4%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
11.9%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
19.0%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 144.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 130.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 115.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.9%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesPima
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.7%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Poor
5.7%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Poor
4.8%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Poor
8.9%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Tragic
11.7%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.8%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.1%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.1%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 75.7%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 69.2%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.6%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.75, a difference of 11.0%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesPima
Family Households
Exceptional
68.3%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.0%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.37
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.6%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 65.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 15.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 6.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.7%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesPima
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.5%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.1%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.8%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
7.9%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (36.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 57.0%), associate's degree (45.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 48.8%), and master's degree (13.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.7% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.82%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesPima
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.6%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.2%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.8%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Fair
64.8%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.7%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Poor
45.0%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Poor
36.4%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 66.5%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 59.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.4%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesPima
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.2%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.8%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Average
3.0%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.8%