Guatemalan vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,606,902 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.416. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 31.9 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,766 compared to $30,644, a difference of 23.2%), median household income ($75,961 compared to $63,262, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,705 compared to $73,365, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $51,503, a difference of 0.040%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,331 compared to $82,821, a difference of 0.60%), and median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $35,326, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 62.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 61.4%), and family poverty (11.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 12.7%), single mother poverty (32.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 17.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 26.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 128.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 102.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 85.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 40.9%), births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 38.7%), and married-couple households (43.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 28.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 63.5%), bachelor's degree (31.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 33.6%), and associate's degree (38.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (82.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 51.1%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 41.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.8%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.3%).