Australian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,864,381 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.164. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.068% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to a decrease of 67.7 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $30,644, a difference of 69.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,533 compared to $73,365, a difference of 54.7%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $77,431, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $51,503, a difference of 4.3%), median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $35,326, a difference of 22.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,912 compared to $82,821, a difference of 30.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 164.6%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 134.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 108.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 6.5%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 36.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 36.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 164.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 126.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 121.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 91.9%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 74.3%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.71%), family households (62.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 98.9%), bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 89.5%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 81.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 75.3%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 61.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and male disability (11.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 13.9%).