Ugandan vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,733,663 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.899. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.152% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to an increase of 152.0 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,047 compared to $30,644, a difference of 47.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,472 compared to $73,365, a difference of 41.0%), and median household income ($87,557 compared to $63,262, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,923 compared to $51,503, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and median female earnings ($40,889 compared to $35,326, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 113.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 100.9%), and family poverty (9.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 98.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 10.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 28.6%), and single mother poverty (28.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 33.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 145.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 98.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 96.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 30.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 80.3%), births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 71.1%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (61.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 37.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 23.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 2.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 85.2%), bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 75.9%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 68.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.2% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.080%), 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and 4th grade (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 69.8%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 60.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.26%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 7.1%).