Immigrants from Laos vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,481,341 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.295. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.064% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 64.3 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Pima communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,909 compared to $73,365, a difference of 23.9%), median household income ($78,327 compared to $63,262, a difference of 23.8%), and per capita income ($37,857 compared to $30,644, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $51,503, a difference of 2.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,553 compared to $82,821, a difference of 3.3%), and median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $35,326, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 100.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 99.7%), and family poverty (10.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 80.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 2.0%), single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 26.3%), and single female poverty (22.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 32.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 148.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 131.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 112.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Pima communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 51.4%), single father households (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 46.0%), and married-couple households (45.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.96%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 73.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 48.8%), bachelor's degree (31.6% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 36.2%), and associate's degree (40.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.9% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.80%), 9th grade (93.2% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 47.8%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 41.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.0%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.0%).