Serbian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,777,289 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Serbian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.972. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Serbians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.154% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Serbians corresponds to an increase of 1,153.8 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Serbian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,551 compared to $30,644, a difference of 51.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,522 compared to $73,365, a difference of 41.1%), and median household income ($87,572 compared to $63,262, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,106 compared to $51,503, a difference of 0.78%), median female earnings ($40,539 compared to $35,326, a difference of 14.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,320 compared to $82,821, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Serbian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 165.1%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 130.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 114.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 10.8%), single mother poverty (28.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 35.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 48.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Serbian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 164.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 128.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 115.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Serbian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 12.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Serbian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 90.6%), births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 67.7%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.9%), family households (63.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Serbian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 50.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 31.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Serbian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 73.7%), bachelor's degree (40.1% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 72.9%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Serbian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 73.2%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 55.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.5%), male disability (11.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.5%).