Immigrants from Uganda vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Pima
6,298
SOCIAL INDEX
60.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
157th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Uganda Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,183,932 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.077% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 76.7 Pima.
Immigrants from Uganda vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,043 compared to $30,644, a difference of 47.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,584 compared to $73,365, a difference of 41.2%), and median household income ($87,553 compared to $63,262, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $51,503, a difference of 1.7%), median female earnings ($40,739 compared to $35,326, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,698 compared to $82,821, a difference of 15.5%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,043 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,188 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $87,553 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,041 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,064 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,739 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,374 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,698 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,584 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,976 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 24.9% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 119.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 103.0%), and family poverty (9.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 102.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 13.2%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 36.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 36.4%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Pima |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Average 9.1% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.7% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 17.0% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.3% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.3% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Average 5.2% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.9% | Tragic 19.0% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 150.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 105.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 85.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 30.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Pima |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Excellent 7.4% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 11.7% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 13.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.5% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.2% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.0% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Tragic 72.8% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 75.2%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 68.7%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.4%), family households (62.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Pima |
Family Households | Tragic 62.7% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.23 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Tragic 51.5% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 41.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 19.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.0% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.0% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 79.9%), bachelor's degree (40.7% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 75.3%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 67.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.050%), 7th grade (96.0% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and 6th grade (96.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.33%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Poor 97.4% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.2% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Fair 96.9% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Fair 96.0% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Average 94.8% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.9% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Average 85.7% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.5% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.9% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.7% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.3% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 69.5%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 59.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 8.4%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Pima |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.8% |