Immigrants from Caribbean vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,597,813 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.558. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to a decrease of 6.3 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,254 compared to $30,644, a difference of 21.6%), median household income ($71,860 compared to $63,262, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,513 compared to $73,365, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $51,503, a difference of 1.5%), median female earnings ($36,414 compared to $35,326, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,326 compared to $82,821, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 61.0%), married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 55.3%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (19.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 3.4%), single father poverty (17.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 17.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 119.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 87.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 83.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 12.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 64.6%), births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 29.3%), and currently married (41.3% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.23%), family households (65.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.95%), and single mother households (8.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 77.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 51.3%), and no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 7.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 17.6%), and no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 38.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 37.4%), bachelor's degree (31.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 35.4%), and associate's degree (39.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (90.6% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.60%), 11th grade (89.1% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.92%), and nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 57.1%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 43.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.2%).