Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,522,311 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 2.7 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,827 compared to $30,644, a difference of 30.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $73,365, a difference of 24.6%), and median household income ($78,682 compared to $63,262, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,736 compared to $82,821, a difference of 4.7%), householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $51,503, a difference of 5.7%), and median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $35,326, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Pima communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 98.0%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 89.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 76.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 11.5%), single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 26.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 31.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 155.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 151.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 117.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 35.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 72.3%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 56.6%), and currently married (44.3% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.4%), family households (62.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 35.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 3.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (35.5% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 52.9%), no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 48.6%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.8% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.73%), 9th grade (93.1% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.84%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 60.7%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 52.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.8%).