Choctaw vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
Choctaw
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Choctaw
Pima
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in Choctaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,682,137 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.630. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 26.4 Pima.
Choctaw vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Pima communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 33.3%), per capita income ($35,999 compared to $30,644, a difference of 17.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $51,503, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $35,326, a difference of 4.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $50,539, a difference of 5.0%), and median earnings ($40,270 compared to $38,285, a difference of 5.2%).
Income Metric | Choctaw | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,999 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,835 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $69,947 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,270 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,729 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,775 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,450 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $78,168 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,287 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,060 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Choctaw vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Pima communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 90.6%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 81.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 74.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 6.0%), single female poverty (27.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 16.8%).
Poverty Metric | Choctaw | Pima |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.3% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.5% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 19.0% |
Choctaw vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 121.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 98.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 90.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 22.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Choctaw | Pima |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 11.7% |
Choctaw vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 7.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Choctaw | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.5% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.4% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.0% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.4% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.5% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.2% | Tragic 72.8% |
Choctaw vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 53.9%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 39.6%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Choctaw | Pima |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.3% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.9% | Tragic 51.5% |
Choctaw vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 79.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.92%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 6.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Choctaw | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.2% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.3% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Choctaw vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 26.8%), associate's degree (37.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 25.0%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%).
Education Level Metric | Choctaw | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.1% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.8% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.8% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.3% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.4% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.3% |
Choctaw vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 76.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 27.9%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.83%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.7%).
Disability Metric | Choctaw | Pima |
Disability | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.7% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.8% |