Peruvian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,567,576 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Peruvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Peruvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Peruvians corresponds to an increase of 7.1 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,479 compared to $30,644, a difference of 45.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,070 compared to $73,365, a difference of 43.2%), and median household income ($90,261 compared to $63,262, a difference of 42.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,052 compared to $51,503, a difference of 8.8%), median female earnings ($40,234 compared to $35,326, a difference of 13.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,886 compared to $82,821, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 115.4%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 109.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 99.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 4.5%), single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 40.4%), and single female poverty (19.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 56.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 151.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 107.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 105.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 75.4%), births to unmarried women (31.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 63.4%), and married-couple households (47.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 25.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 65.4%), bachelor's degree (38.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 65.2%), and associate's degree (46.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.8% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 73.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 63.8%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.7%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.2%).