Moroccan vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,581,540 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Moroccan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.547. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Moroccans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.320% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Moroccans corresponds to an increase of 320.4 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,854 compared to $30,644, a difference of 49.6%), median household income ($86,468 compared to $63,262, a difference of 36.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,138 compared to $73,365, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,256 compared to $51,503, a difference of 3.4%), wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,117 compared to $82,821, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 101.2%), family poverty (9.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 87.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 82.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 15.0%), single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 30.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 39.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 139.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 111.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 99.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.7% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 90.7%), births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 61.9%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.59%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and family households (61.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 60.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 38.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (48.8% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 1.1%), no vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (48.8% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 81.4%), bachelor's degree (40.5% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 74.4%), and associate's degree (48.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.10%), 7th grade (95.8% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and 4th grade (97.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 65.8%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 52.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.2%).