Immigrants from Ghana vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,929,080 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to an increase of 54.6 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,131 compared to $30,644, a difference of 34.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,982 compared to $73,365, a difference of 29.5%), and median household income ($81,489 compared to $63,262, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,333 compared to $51,503, a difference of 0.33%), wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,760 compared to $82,821, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 92.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 71.8%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 69.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 13.3%), single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 29.1%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 34.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 117.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 98.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 87.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 71.4%), births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 49.1%), and currently married (42.7% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.7%), family households (63.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 52.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 36.4%), and no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 62.1%), bachelor's degree (36.9% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 59.1%), and associate's degree (44.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.8% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.15%), 8th grade (94.8% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.82%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 57.5%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 48.4%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.5%).