Israeli vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,454,124 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Israeli communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.392. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Israelis within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Israelis corresponds to a decrease of 4.8 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Israeli and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,596 compared to $30,644, a difference of 71.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,186 compared to $73,365, a difference of 55.6%), and median family income ($118,577 compared to $77,431, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,335 compared to $51,503, a difference of 1.6%), median female earnings ($43,852 compared to $35,326, a difference of 24.1%), and wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Israeli and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 114.2%), family poverty (8.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 107.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 93.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 14.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 36.1%), and single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 37.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Israeli and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 148.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 118.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 108.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Israeli and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Israeli and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 111.8%), births to unmarried women (28.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 80.1%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.4%), family households (63.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 50.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 31.4%), and no vehicles in household (12.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.31%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.7% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (12.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Israeli and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (20.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 119.9%), professional degree (6.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 109.5%), and doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 106.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and 5th grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 82.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 68.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 65.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.5%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.6%).