African vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,114,204 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Africans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Africans corresponds to a decrease of 4.5 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,785 compared to $30,644, a difference of 23.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,925 compared to $73,365, a difference of 15.8%), and median household income ($72,650 compared to $63,262, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,530 compared to $35,326, a difference of 3.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,986 compared to $82,821, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,711 compared to $50,539, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 91.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 75.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 16.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and single female poverty (24.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 110.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 81.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 78.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 12.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.5% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 70.2%), births to unmarried women (39.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and currently married (41.8% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.22%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 34.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 21.2%), and no vehicles in household (12.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.36%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (12.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (32.9% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 41.7%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 39.3%), and associate's degree (41.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.15%), 7th grade (95.8% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and 6th grade (96.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 47.2%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 31.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.78%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and male disability (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.1%).