South American Indian vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

South American Indian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

South American Indians

Pima

Average
Poor
4,820
SOCIAL INDEX
45.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
193rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in South American Indian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,968,546 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.126. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.034% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 34.3 Pima.
South American Indian Integration in Pima Communities

South American Indian vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,206 compared to $30,644, a difference of 44.3%), median household income ($87,446 compared to $63,262, a difference of 38.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,171 compared to $73,365, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,979 compared to $51,503, a difference of 2.9%), median female earnings ($40,019 compared to $35,326, a difference of 13.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,497 compared to $82,821, a difference of 16.5%).
South American Indian vs Pima Income
Income MetricSouth American IndianPima
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,206
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Good
$103,624
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,446
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Good
$46,952
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,508
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,019
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,979
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,497
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,171
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$62,215
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Exceptional
21.1%

South American Indian vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 114.0%), family poverty (9.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 100.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 87.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 6.4%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 31.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 41.2%).
South American Indian vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricSouth American IndianPima
Poverty
Fair
12.7%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Fair
11.5%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Average
17.4%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Average
29.3%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.9%
Tragic
19.0%

South American Indian vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 149.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 111.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 109.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.5%).
South American Indian vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSouth American IndianPima
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.6%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
11.7%

South American Indian vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.1%).
South American Indian vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSouth American IndianPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
72.8%

South American Indian vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 85.6%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 62.2%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.2%).
South American Indian vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSouth American IndianPima
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.26
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.3%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Poor
45.8%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.7%
Tragic
51.5%

South American Indian vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.6%), no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 15.3%).
South American Indian vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSouth American IndianPima
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.0%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
7.9%

South American Indian vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 71.8%), bachelor's degree (39.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 69.5%), and associate's degree (47.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.3% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.47%).
South American Indian vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricSouth American IndianPima
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
92.0%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.6%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.5%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.0%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.4%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.3%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.9%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
1.3%

South American Indian vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 67.0%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 54.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.4%).
South American Indian vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricSouth American IndianPima
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.1%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%