Ecuadorian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,511,773 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.136. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 6.1 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,958 compared to $30,644, a difference of 36.9%), median household income ($82,070 compared to $63,262, a difference of 29.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $73,365, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $51,503, a difference of 4.7%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $50,539, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 76.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 75.2%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 70.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 11.7%), single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 25.3%), and receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 118.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 88.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 78.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 75.0%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 54.7%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 76.2%), no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 61.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 10.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 56.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 52.5%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 51.3%), and associate's degree (43.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (90.6% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.61%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 63.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 51.1%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.0%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.0%).