Belgian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,498,484 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Belgian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.668. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belgians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belgians corresponds to an increase of 56.9 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Belgian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,951 compared to $30,644, a difference of 43.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,060 compared to $73,365, a difference of 36.4%), and wage/income gap (28.8% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,113 compared to $51,503, a difference of 2.8%), median female earnings ($38,382 compared to $35,326, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,262 compared to $82,821, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belgian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 169.5%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 131.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 116.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 13.9%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 30.0%), and single female poverty (21.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 40.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belgian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 171.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 137.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 104.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belgian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 27.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belgian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 77.7%), births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 62.9%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.88%), family households (63.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belgian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 76.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 4.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belgian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 59.6%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 56.4%), and associate's degree (46.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belgian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 69.8%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 56.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.8%), male disability (12.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 6.7%).