Immigrants from Chile vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,484,147 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.091% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 91.3 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $30,644, a difference of 50.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $73,365, a difference of 41.0%), and median household income ($88,388 compared to $63,262, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $51,503, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $35,326, a difference of 14.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $82,821, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 115.7%), family poverty (8.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 106.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 93.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 6.2%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 36.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 46.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 164.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 112.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 111.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 90.4%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 65.1%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.0%), family households (64.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 29.6%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 81.3%), bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 76.0%), and associate's degree (49.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.23%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 75.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 59.4%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.5%).