Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Costa Rica
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Costa Rica

Pima

Fair
Poor
3,937
SOCIAL INDEX
36.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
208th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Immigrants from Costa Rica Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,574,556 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.215% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to an increase of 215.2 Pima.
Immigrants from Costa Rica Integration in Pima Communities

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,464 compared to $30,644, a difference of 41.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,141 compared to $73,365, a difference of 36.5%), and median household income ($85,054 compared to $63,262, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $51,503, a difference of 2.2%), median female earnings ($39,186 compared to $35,326, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,876 compared to $82,821, a difference of 12.1%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Pima Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaPima
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,464
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,354
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Average
$85,054
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,928
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,237
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,186
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,643
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,876
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$100,141
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$59,848
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Exceptional
21.1%

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 109.9%), family poverty (9.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 95.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 87.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 10.1%), single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 32.2%), and single female poverty (20.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 45.5%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaPima
Poverty
Fair
12.5%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Fair
9.4%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Fair
11.3%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.7%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.4%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.7%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Good
20.9%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Average
29.2%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Fair
12.2%
Tragic
19.0%

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 148.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 110.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 107.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.9%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaPima
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Poor
11.8%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Poor
5.6%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
9.0%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Tragic
11.7%

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.5%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.5%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.6%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.9%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.2%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 74.0%), births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 54.3%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.50%), family households with children (28.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.6%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaPima
Family Households
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.3%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.26
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Poor
46.0%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.4%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 37.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 12.0%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaPima
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.3%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.8%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.4%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
7.9%

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (36.9% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 59.1%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 58.4%), and associate's degree (45.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.0% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.53%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaPima
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.7%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.4%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.5%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.2%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.5%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Poor
45.0%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.9%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 71.0%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 51.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.3%).
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Costa RicaPima
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.6%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.8%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Excellent
5.9%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%