Immigrants from Malaysia vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Malaysia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Malaysia

Pima

Good
Poor
7,792
SOCIAL INDEX
75.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
105th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Immigrants from Malaysia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,749,564 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.214% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 213.7 Pima.
Immigrants from Malaysia Integration in Pima Communities

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,983 compared to $30,644, a difference of 63.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,796 compared to $73,365, a difference of 53.7%), and median household income ($96,292 compared to $63,262, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $51,503, a difference of 5.2%), median female earnings ($43,835 compared to $35,326, a difference of 24.1%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 24.5%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Pima Income
Income MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaPima
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,983
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,880
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,292
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,514
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,121
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,835
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,179
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$107,650
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,796
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,497
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
21.1%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 121.8%), family poverty (8.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 117.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 104.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 2.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 38.7%), and single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 41.4%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaPima
Poverty
Good
12.0%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.5%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.0%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.3%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
19.0%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 171.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 133.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 130.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.3%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaPima
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
11.7%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.7%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.3%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.3%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 104.2%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 88.1%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.0%), family households (64.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.75, a difference of 16.3%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaPima
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 33.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 20.5%), and no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 0.21%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.0%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaPima
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.5%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.7%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
7.9%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 104.5%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 94.4%), and bachelor's degree (45.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 94.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.26%), 7th grade (95.6% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and 6th grade (96.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.54%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaPima
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.5%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.3%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.3%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.5%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.0%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 80.4%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 72.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 65.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.4%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 20.3%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaPima
Disability
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.4%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%