Bermudan vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,091,708 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Bermudan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bermudans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.233% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bermudans corresponds to an increase of 2,232.8 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,911 compared to $30,644, a difference of 40.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,197 compared to $73,365, a difference of 28.4%), and median household income ($80,406 compared to $63,262, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,231 compared to $82,821, a difference of 6.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,359 compared to $51,503, a difference of 8.7%), and wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 119.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 86.4%), and family poverty (9.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 86.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 14.8%), single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 26.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 29.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 137.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 92.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 79.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 96.2%), births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 44.9%), and currently married (43.5% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (62.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 24.1%), and no vehicles in household (12.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.6% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and no vehicles in household (12.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 66.7%), bachelor's degree (38.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 63.7%), and associate's degree (46.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and 4th grade (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 59.8%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 48.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.3%).