Immigrants from Africa vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,989,006 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.239. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Africa corresponds to a decrease of 7.1 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,950 compared to $30,644, a difference of 40.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,284 compared to $73,365, a difference of 32.6%), and median household income ($83,289 compared to $63,262, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,609 compared to $51,503, a difference of 1.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,372 compared to $82,821, a difference of 9.1%), and wage/income gap (23.2% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 109.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 85.5%), and family poverty (9.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 85.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 6.8%), single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 31.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 35.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 140.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 102.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 101.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 75.9%), births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 55.9%), and currently married (43.9% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.2%), family households (62.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 25.5%), and no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.45%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 69.9%), bachelor's degree (38.9% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 67.7%), and associate's degree (46.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.3% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.41%), 8th grade (95.2% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 62.7%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 55.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.2%).