Malaysian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,937,047 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.636. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.113% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 112.9 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,517 compared to $73,365, a difference of 28.8%), median household income ($81,064 compared to $63,262, a difference of 28.1%), and per capita income ($39,194 compared to $30,644, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $51,503, a difference of 0.22%), median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $35,326, a difference of 5.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,291 compared to $82,821, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 113.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 102.8%), and family poverty (9.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 90.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 29.9%), and single female poverty (22.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 36.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 148.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 120.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 112.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 53.0%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 51.9%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.10%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 83.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (32.9% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 41.9%), associate's degree (41.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 37.8%), and no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.5% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 52.0%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 43.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.0%).