Sri Lankan vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Sri Lankan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Sri Lankans

Pima

Good
Poor
7,460
SOCIAL INDEX
72.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
116th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Sri Lankan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,713,075 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima within Sri Lankan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.017. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sri Lankans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sri Lankans corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 Pima.
Sri Lankan Integration in Pima Communities

Sri Lankan vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,270 compared to $73,365, a difference of 47.6%), median household income ($93,093 compared to $63,262, a difference of 47.2%), and per capita income ($44,014 compared to $30,644, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,470 compared to $51,503, a difference of 7.7%), median female earnings ($40,496 compared to $35,326, a difference of 14.6%), and wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 22.3%).
Sri Lankan vs Pima Income
Income MetricSri LankanPima
Per Capita Income
Average
$44,014
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,234
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,093
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,040
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,136
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,496
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,470
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,960
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,270
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,201
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Exceptional
21.1%

Sri Lankan vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 124.8%), family poverty (8.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 117.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 107.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 4.3%), single mother poverty (26.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 44.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 56.2%).
Sri Lankan vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricSri LankanPima
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Excellent
10.6%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.7%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
10.9%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.4%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
19.0%

Sri Lankan vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 159.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 123.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 121.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.7%).
Sri Lankan vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSri LankanPima
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Average
5.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
11.7%

Sri Lankan vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.5%).
Sri Lankan vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSri LankanPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.5%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.9%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
72.8%

Sri Lankan vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 77.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 77.5%), and married-couple households (49.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.7%), family households with children (29.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.75, a difference of 11.8%).
Sri Lankan vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSri LankanPima
Family Households
Exceptional
67.7%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.5%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.0%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.35
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Average
2.4%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.2%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.9%
Tragic
51.5%

Sri Lankan vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 86.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 7.1%).
Sri Lankan vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSri LankanPima
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.5%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.0%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.6%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
7.9%

Sri Lankan vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (38.2% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 64.5%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 59.1%), and associate's degree (46.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.8% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.76%), 9th grade (93.2% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.82%), and nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Sri Lankan vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricSri LankanPima
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.7%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.4%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.2%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.3%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.2%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.3%

Sri Lankan vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 68.0%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 61.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 58.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 7.8%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age over 75 (48.5% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 15.2%).
Sri Lankan vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricSri LankanPima
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.5%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%