Paraguayan vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,038,686 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Paraguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.175. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Paraguayans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.046% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Paraguayans corresponds to a decrease of 45.8 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,385 compared to $30,644, a difference of 64.4%), median household income ($95,737 compared to $63,262, a difference of 51.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,447 compared to $73,365, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,614 compared to $51,503, a difference of 8.0%), median female earnings ($43,173 compared to $35,326, a difference of 22.2%), and wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 121.6%), family poverty (8.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 120.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 111.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 3.1%), single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 41.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 46.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 177.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 126.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 92.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 103.4%), births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 73.5%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.010%), family households (64.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 59.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 33.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 0.65%), no vehicles in household (14.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 103.4%), bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 89.8%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 77.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.050%), 7th grade (95.9% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and 6th grade (96.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 88.0%), disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 86.1%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 64.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.2%).