Tongan vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,330,756 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima within Tongan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tongans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tongans corresponds to an increase of 2.3 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tongan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,643 compared to $73,365, a difference of 48.1%), median household income ($93,076 compared to $63,262, a difference of 47.1%), and median family income ($105,967 compared to $77,431, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,288 compared to $35,326, a difference of 8.4%), householder income under 25 years ($56,972 compared to $51,503, a difference of 10.6%), and median earnings ($45,665 compared to $38,285, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tongan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 140.7%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 139.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 127.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (12.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 20.9%), single mother poverty (26.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 45.4%), and single female poverty (18.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 61.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tongan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 183.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 181.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 150.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 32.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tongan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 20.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 11.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tongan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 81.4%), single father households (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 65.8%), and married-couple households (51.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (69.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.6%), average family size (3.49 compared to 3.75, a difference of 7.3%), and family households with children (31.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tongan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 97.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (63.5% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.9% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 7.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 20.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (63.5% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tongan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (34.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 47.7%), associate's degree (43.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 42.4%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.49%), 6th grade (96.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and 9th grade (94.4% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tongan and Pima communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 67.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 62.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.4%).