Immigrants vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,435,179 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.394. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to a decrease of 9.4 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,010 compared to $30,644, a difference of 40.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,943 compared to $73,365, a difference of 36.2%), and median household income ($85,818 compared to $63,262, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,201 compared to $51,503, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($39,328 compared to $35,326, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,423 compared to $82,821, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 89.1%), family poverty (10.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 84.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 80.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 7.4%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 29.8%), and single female poverty (21.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 41.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 140.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 108.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 100.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 70.2%), births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 57.5%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.32%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 21.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 58.3%), bachelor's degree (36.7% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 58.2%), and associate's degree (44.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.0% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 62.9%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 51.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.1%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.6%).