Nepalese vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 10,969,219 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Nepalese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.446. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nepalese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nepalese corresponds to an increase of 20.3 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($82,410 compared to $63,262, a difference of 30.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,355 compared to $73,365, a difference of 27.3%), and per capita income ($38,442 compared to $30,644, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.2% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income under 25 years ($54,472 compared to $51,503, a difference of 5.8%), and median female earnings ($38,603 compared to $35,326, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 89.1%), family poverty (10.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 76.3%), and married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 74.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 2.3%), receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 29.8%), and single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 31.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 144.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 110.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 93.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (33.5% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 53.5%), single father households (3.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 33.9%), and married-couple households (45.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.9%), divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.42 compared to 3.75, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 91.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 18.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.6% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 7.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 79.9%), associate's degree (39.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 29.2%), and bachelor's degree (29.9% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (90.7% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.52%), 11th grade (89.5% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and nursery school (96.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (28.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 37.7%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 36.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.5%), male disability (12.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age over 75 (52.6% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 6.2%).