Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Pima
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in Immigrants from South Central Asia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,077,073 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.273. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 3.3 Pima.
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,660 compared to $30,644, a difference of 71.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($124,188 compared to $73,365, a difference of 69.3%), and median household income ($106,057 compared to $63,262, a difference of 67.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $51,503, a difference of 12.3%), median female earnings ($46,324 compared to $35,326, a difference of 31.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $50,539, a difference of 38.7%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,660 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,956 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $106,057 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $57,114 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $68,960 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,324 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,818 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $116,626 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $124,188 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $70,103 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.3% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 164.7%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 154.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 135.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.8%), single mother poverty (25.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 52.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 61.5%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Pima |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Exceptional 9.3% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.6% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 17.8% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 25.3% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 8.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 186.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 137.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 134.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Pima |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 11.7% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 16.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.6% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.0% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 72.8% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 112.5%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 108.6%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.72%), family households with children (30.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.75, a difference of 16.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Pima |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 30.0% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.6% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 50.0% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 51.5% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 65.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 14.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.5% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.6% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (20.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 124.0%), bachelor's degree (48.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 108.3%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 99.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.040%), 5th grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and 4th grade (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Good 97.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Good 97.5% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Good 97.2% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.4% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 72.1% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.7% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.3% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.7% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.3% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 87.4%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 86.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 82.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 21.4%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Pima |
Disability | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.0% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.8% |