Immigrants from Congo vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Pima
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,814,905 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.563. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.464% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 464.4 Pima.
Immigrants from Congo vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $51,503, a difference of 19.0%), per capita income ($35,720 compared to $30,644, a difference of 16.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $82,821, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $50,539, a difference of 1.7%), median earnings ($39,169 compared to $38,285, a difference of 2.3%), and wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 2.7%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,720 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,216 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $66,768 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,169 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $44,204 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,317 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $43,266 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $72,178 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $77,850 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,393 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 91.4%), married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 85.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 69.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 4.2%), single mother poverty (33.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 14.9%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Pima |
Poverty | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.6% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.5% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 22.4% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 19.0% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 147.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 108.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 95.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 36.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 39.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Pima |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 11.7% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 22.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 12.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.7% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.6% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 72.8% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 65.2%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 39.9%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.75, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.77%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Pima |
Family Households | Tragic 59.2% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.3% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 39.0% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.1% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.8% | Tragic 51.5% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 49.9%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.20%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 29.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.0% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.1% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (33.6% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 44.7%), associate's degree (41.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 38.3%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.66%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.4% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.0% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.0% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.7% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.6% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.6% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.3% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 48.5%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 44.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.72%), and cognitive disability (19.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.9%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Pima |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.7% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.2% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |