Scotch-Irish vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Scotch-Irish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Scotch-Irish

Pima

Average
Poor
5,433
SOCIAL INDEX
51.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
176th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Scotch-Irish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,160,089 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Scotch-Irish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.760. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scotch-Irish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.093% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scotch-Irish corresponds to an increase of 92.9 Pima.
Scotch-Irish Integration in Pima Communities

Scotch-Irish vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,563 compared to $30,644, a difference of 38.9%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 34.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,073 compared to $73,365, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,039 compared to $51,503, a difference of 5.0%), median female earnings ($37,383 compared to $35,326, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,969 compared to $82,821, a difference of 8.6%).
Scotch-Irish vs Pima Income
Income MetricScotch-IrishPima
Per Capita Income
Fair
$42,563
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Poor
$99,591
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,972
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Poor
$44,924
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,658
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,383
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,039
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,969
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,073
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$59,447
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.5%
Exceptional
21.1%

Scotch-Irish vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 152.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 121.0%), and family poverty (8.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 114.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 22.6%), single father poverty (18.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 25.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 31.5%).
Scotch-Irish vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricScotch-IrishPima
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Good
13.3%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.3%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.7%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.5%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
19.0%

Scotch-Irish vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 156.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 121.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 94.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.1%).
Scotch-Irish vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricScotch-IrishPima
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
11.7%

Scotch-Irish vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 21.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.3% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 11.5%).
Scotch-Irish vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricScotch-IrishPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.3%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.5%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.0%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
72.8%

Scotch-Irish vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 81.3%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 54.8%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.17%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (64.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Scotch-Irish vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricScotch-IrishPima
Family Households
Average
64.4%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.3%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.7%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Tragic
51.5%

Scotch-Irish vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 107.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 8.1%).
Scotch-Irish vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricScotch-IrishPima
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.9%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.9%

Scotch-Irish vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (36.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 57.1%), master's degree (14.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 55.6%), and associate's degree (45.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%).
Scotch-Irish vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricScotch-IrishPima
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.8%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.4%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.9%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.3%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Poor
36.4%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.3%

Scotch-Irish vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 61.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 58.0%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.90%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and male disability (13.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.8%).
Scotch-Irish vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricScotch-IrishPima
Disability
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.3%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.1%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.8%