Hawaiian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,178,674 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 7.8 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,778 compared to $73,365, a difference of 34.6%), median household income ($84,729 compared to $63,262, a difference of 33.9%), and per capita income ($39,403 compared to $30,644, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $51,503, a difference of 3.1%), median female earnings ($37,497 compared to $35,326, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,722 compared to $82,821, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 121.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 115.0%), and family poverty (9.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 103.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 2.1%), single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 32.2%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 43.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 133.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 120.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 114.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 12.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 57.0%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 55.0%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (28.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 75.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 16.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 6.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 10.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (31.6% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 36.3%), associate's degree (40.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 35.4%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.11%), 6th grade (96.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and 4th grade (97.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 51.2%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 45.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.6%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.8%).