Yugoslavian vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,979,905 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Yugoslavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.057. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yugoslavians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yugoslavians corresponds to a decrease of 7.7 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,792 compared to $30,644, a difference of 39.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,558 compared to $73,365, a difference of 33.0%), and median household income ($82,186 compared to $63,262, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,028 compared to $51,503, a difference of 0.93%), median female earnings ($38,573 compared to $35,326, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,368 compared to $82,821, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 145.8%), family poverty (8.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 115.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 112.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 10.2%), single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 31.4%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 43.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 163.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 131.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 122.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 77.8%), births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 66.9%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.36%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and family households (63.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 57.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (37.1% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 59.9%), master's degree (14.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 55.4%), and associate's degree (46.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 65.4%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 53.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.2%), male disability (11.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.1%).