Immigrants from Moldova vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,788,605 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.770. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to an increase of 59.8 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,489 compared to $30,644, a difference of 55.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,357 compared to $73,365, a difference of 46.3%), and median household income ($91,446 compared to $63,262, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,168 compared to $51,503, a difference of 9.1%), median female earnings ($42,304 compared to $35,326, a difference of 19.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,091 compared to $82,821, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 143.3%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 138.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 110.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 3.0%), single mother poverty (26.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 47.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 59.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 167.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 133.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 124.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 95.6%), births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 88.7%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.0%), family households (64.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 44.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 79.7%), bachelor's degree (41.6% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 79.3%), and associate's degree (50.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 66.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.040%), 6th grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 70.2%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 62.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 7.9%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.5%).