Tohono O'odham vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,140,751 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.221. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.191% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 191.0 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Pima communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($69,068 compared to $82,821, a difference of 19.9%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $51,503, a difference of 13.8%), and median family income ($72,193 compared to $77,431, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,774 compared to $73,365, a difference of 0.56%), per capita income ($30,256 compared to $30,644, a difference of 1.3%), and median household income ($61,663 compared to $63,262, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (22.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 49.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 24.8%), and receiving food stamps (21.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (24.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 76.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 40.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.3%), single father households (3.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.8%), currently married (36.8% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 16.9%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Pima communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 16.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 106.1%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 20.4%), and male disability (14.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (15.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.5%).