Icelander vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,479,480 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.347. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.593% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 593.0 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,987 compared to $30,644, a difference of 46.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,261 compared to $73,365, a difference of 39.4%), and median household income ($85,797 compared to $63,262, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $51,503, a difference of 0.50%), median female earnings ($39,109 compared to $35,326, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,560 compared to $82,821, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 152.0%), family poverty (8.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 120.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 103.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.6%), single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 30.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 32.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 167.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 134.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 128.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 19.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 80.4%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 69.8%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.9%), family households (63.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 46.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 11.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (39.5% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 70.4%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 67.5%), and associate's degree (48.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.080%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 65.8%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 55.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.6%).