Immigrants from Guyana vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,732,472 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Guyana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.455. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guyana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.030% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guyana corresponds to a decrease of 30.3 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,742 compared to $30,644, a difference of 33.0%), median household income ($80,324 compared to $63,262, a difference of 27.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,186 compared to $73,365, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,586 compared to $82,821, a difference of 8.2%), householder income under 25 years ($55,726 compared to $51,503, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,495 compared to $50,539, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Pima communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 77.2%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 71.4%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 11.6%), receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and single mother poverty (29.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 29.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 111.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 97.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 79.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 25.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 13.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 97.0%), births to unmarried women (35.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 47.3%), and married-couple households (41.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.64%), family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (3.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 131.5%), no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 108.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 96.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.6% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 22.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.0% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 48.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 96.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 47.5%), bachelor's degree (33.9% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 46.3%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.2% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.080%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 63.5%), hearing disability (2.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 60.1%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.56%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.5%).