Immigrants from Asia vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,090,958 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.368. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,741 compared to $30,644, a difference of 62.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $73,365, a difference of 58.9%), and median household income ($99,933 compared to $63,262, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $51,503, a difference of 9.5%), median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $35,326, a difference of 25.1%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 27.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 135.6%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 131.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 118.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.20%), single mother poverty (26.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 46.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 53.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 165.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 133.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 127.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 100.2%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 92.2%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.18%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.75, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 30.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 99.1%), bachelor's degree (44.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 90.9%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 84.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.2% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.41%), 9th grade (94.4% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 79.3%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 73.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 70.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.090%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.6%).