South African vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

South African
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

South Africans

Pima

Excellent
Poor
8,851
SOCIAL INDEX
86.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
44th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in South African Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,832,701 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within South African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.871. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.042% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Africans corresponds to an increase of 1,042.2 Pima.
South African Integration in Pima Communities

South African vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between South African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,044 compared to $30,644, a difference of 63.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,719 compared to $73,365, a difference of 49.5%), and median household income ($93,379 compared to $63,262, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,383 compared to $51,503, a difference of 0.23%), median female earnings ($41,825 compared to $35,326, a difference of 18.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,160 compared to $82,821, a difference of 24.6%).
South African vs Pima Income
Income MetricSouth AfricanPima
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,044
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$113,229
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,379
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,752
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,460
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,825
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,383
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$103,160
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$109,719
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,652
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Exceptional
21.1%

South African vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 149.7%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 123.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 104.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 9.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 34.6%), and single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 35.3%).
South African vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricSouth AfricanPima
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Excellent
12.8%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.1%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.0%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Average
12.8%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
19.0%

South African vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 152.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 118.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 117.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 22.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.1%).
South African vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSouth AfricanPima
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
11.7%

South African vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.8%).
South African vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSouth AfricanPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.3%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.7%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.3%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Tragic
72.8%

South African vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 95.3%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 68.8%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (63.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.8%).
South African vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSouth AfricanPima
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.6%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Tragic
51.5%

South African vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 37.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 14.1%).
South African vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSouth AfricanPima
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.9%

South African vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 95.7%), bachelor's degree (43.6% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 87.7%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 77.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%), 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.050%).
South African vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricSouth AfricanPima
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.7%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.4%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.6%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.1%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.3%

South African vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South African and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 75.9%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 55.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.4%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.7%).
South African vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricSouth AfricanPima
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.9%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.5%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Fair
3.1%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%