Hmong vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,197,849 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.253. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.213% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 212.9 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Pima communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 31.2%), per capita income ($38,120 compared to $30,644, a difference of 24.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $73,365, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $35,326, a difference of 0.49%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,258 compared to $82,821, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $51,503, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 129.2%), family poverty (9.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 101.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 99.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 7.5%), single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 23.5%), and single female poverty (23.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 31.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 159.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 136.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 117.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 42.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Pima communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 85.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 76.3%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 36.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (34.8% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 49.8%), master's degree (13.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 44.9%), and associate's degree (43.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.020%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 50.4%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 45.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and male disability (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.9%).