Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Grenada
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Grenada

Pima

Poor
Poor
1,656
SOCIAL INDEX
14.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
293rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Immigrants from Grenada Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,531,505 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.110. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.062% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 62.3 Pima.
Immigrants from Grenada Integration in Pima Communities

Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,123 compared to $30,644, a difference of 34.2%), wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 30.6%), and median household income ($76,517 compared to $63,262, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $50,539, a difference of 0.41%), householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $51,503, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,311 compared to $82,821, a difference of 6.6%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Income
Income MetricImmigrants from GrenadaPima
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,123
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Tragic
$89,249
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,517
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,596
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,279
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,932
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,538
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,311
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$85,552
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,747
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
21.1%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pima communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 71.6%), married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 56.5%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 6.6%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 14.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 25.3%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from GrenadaPima
Poverty
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
19.0%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 118.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 89.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 85.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and male unemployment (7.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.5%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from GrenadaPima
Unemployment
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
11.7%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 34.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 10.8%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from GrenadaPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.6%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.7%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
67.2%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.8%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.3%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.0%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 108.4%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 41.8%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.75, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (62.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and married-couple households (37.5% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 5.5%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from GrenadaPima
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.2%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.5%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.1%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 187.5%), no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 165.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 142.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 37.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 81.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 142.4%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from GrenadaPima
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
37.5%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
62.7%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
28.7%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
7.9%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 50.9%), bachelor's degree (35.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 50.7%), and associate's degree (42.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.6% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.53%), 9th grade (93.0% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.97%), and nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from GrenadaPima
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.8%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.0%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.4%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.6%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.1%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.4%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.6%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.0%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Pima communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 69.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 62.4%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.4%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from GrenadaPima
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Fair
12.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.94%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.1%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.8%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
47.9%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.8%