Immigrants from Belarus vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Pima
7,566
SOCIAL INDEX
73.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
113th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Belarus Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,085,314 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.560. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.063% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to an increase of 62.6 Pima.
Immigrants from Belarus vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,303 compared to $30,644, a difference of 64.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,430 compared to $73,365, a difference of 51.9%), and median household income ($94,399 compared to $63,262, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $51,503, a difference of 8.2%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 21.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $50,539, a difference of 23.0%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Belarus | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,303 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,586 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $94,399 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,043 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,658 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $44,757 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,743 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $107,393 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,430 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $62,162 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.7% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Immigrants from Belarus vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Pima communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 115.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 112.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 111.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 7.3%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 40.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 53.2%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Belarus | Pima |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Excellent 12.8% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.5% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.0% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Immigrants from Belarus vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 153.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 124.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 118.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Belarus | Pima |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Tragic 11.7% |
Immigrants from Belarus vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Belarus | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.2% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.4% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.0% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Tragic 72.8% |
Immigrants from Belarus vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 124.7%), births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 100.8%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (63.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 15.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Belarus | Pima |
Family Households | Tragic 63.7% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.2% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.17 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.1% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 25.6% | Tragic 51.5% |
Immigrants from Belarus vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Pima communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 65.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 42.0%), and no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 18.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Belarus | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 83.3% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 47.9% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants from Belarus vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 104.3%), bachelor's degree (45.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 94.0%), and associate's degree (52.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 74.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.13%), 7th grade (96.3% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and 4th grade (97.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.21%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Belarus | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Good 97.1% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.0% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.3% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.2% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.2% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.3% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.2% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.1% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 52.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.0% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.9% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.3% |
Immigrants from Belarus vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 77.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 67.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 66.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.8%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 14.1%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Belarus | Pima |
Disability | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.1% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.5% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |