White/Caucasian vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Pima
5,140
SOCIAL INDEX
48.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
185th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in White/Caucasian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,523,352 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.341. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.041% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to a decrease of 41.2 Pima.
White/Caucasian vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,180 compared to $30,644, a difference of 37.7%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 35.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,091 compared to $73,365, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $51,503, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($37,531 compared to $35,326, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,668 compared to $82,821, a difference of 10.7%).
Income Metric | White/Caucasian | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Poor $42,180 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Poor $99,800 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,029 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,197 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,925 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,531 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,336 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,668 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,091 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,847 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.5% | Exceptional 21.1% |
White/Caucasian vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 136.5%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 109.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 108.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 23.8%), single father poverty (18.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 24.3%), and single female poverty (22.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 33.6%).
Poverty Metric | White/Caucasian | Pima |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 18.1% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.2% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.1% | Tragic 19.0% |
White/Caucasian vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 153.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 120.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 95.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.4%).
Unemployment Metric | White/Caucasian | Pima |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.9% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 11.7% |
White/Caucasian vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 13.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 11.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | White/Caucasian | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.5% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.3% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 72.8% |
White/Caucasian vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 74.7%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 54.8%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | White/Caucasian | Pima |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.1% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.6% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.6% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Tragic 51.5% |
White/Caucasian vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 100.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 17.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 7.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | White/Caucasian | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.1% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.8% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.6% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
White/Caucasian vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (35.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 52.0%), master's degree (13.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 49.4%), and associate's degree (44.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
Education Level Metric | White/Caucasian | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.3% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 91.8% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.1% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.2% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.0% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.6% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 44.2% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.3% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.3% |
White/Caucasian vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 59.3%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 56.5%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.77%).
Disability Metric | White/Caucasian | Pima |
Disability | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.3% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |