Immigrants from the Azores vs Pima Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from the Azores
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from the Azores

Pima

Poor
Poor
1,552
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
302nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pima Integration in Immigrants from the Azores Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 17,291,829 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from the Azores communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from the Azores within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from the Azores corresponds to an increase of 27.6 Pima.
Immigrants from the Azores Integration in Pima Communities

Immigrants from the Azores vs Pima Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,608 compared to $30,644, a difference of 29.2%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 28.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,138 compared to $73,365, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,621 compared to $51,503, a difference of 2.2%), householder income over 65 years ($52,121 compared to $50,539, a difference of 3.1%), and median female earnings ($38,573 compared to $35,326, a difference of 9.2%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Pima Income
Income MetricImmigrants from the AzoresPima
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,608
Tragic
$30,644
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,402
Tragic
$77,431
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,357
Tragic
$63,262
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,812
Tragic
$38,285
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,503
Tragic
$42,357
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,573
Tragic
$35,326
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,621
Poor
$51,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,322
Tragic
$82,821
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,138
Tragic
$73,365
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,121
Tragic
$50,539
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
21.1%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Pima Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 112.6%), family poverty (10.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 78.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 70.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 8.0%), receiving food stamps (16.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and single mother poverty (32.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 19.8%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Pima Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from the AzoresPima
Poverty
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
21.9%
Families
Tragic
10.3%
Tragic
18.4%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
28.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
25.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
27.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
29.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
29.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
28.2%
Single Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Females
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Fathers
Excellent
15.9%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.2%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
11.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
19.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
23.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
19.0%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Pima Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 103.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 103.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 94.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.72%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.0%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Pima Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from the AzoresPima
Unemployment
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
8.2%
Males
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
8.3%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
16.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
23.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
18.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
11.7%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Pima Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 22.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.8% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 10.8%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Pima Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from the AzoresPima
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.6%
Tragic
57.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.8%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Tragic
34.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.2%
Tragic
69.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.5%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.1%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Pima Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 47.9%), births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 30.1%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.46%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.8%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Pima Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from the AzoresPima
Family Households
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Tragic
35.6%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Exceptional
3.75
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.1%
Tragic
35.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.6%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Pima Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 45.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 2.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.8%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Pima Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from the AzoresPima
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Tragic
86.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.4%
Tragic
52.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
22.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.5%
Exceptional
7.9%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Pima Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.7%), associate's degree (35.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 17.9%), and bachelor's degree (27.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (85.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.88%), 11th grade (87.2% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Pima Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from the AzoresPima
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.0%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.2%
Tragic
88.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.3%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.8%
Tragic
81.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
78.7%
Tragic
76.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
54.7%
Tragic
51.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
45.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
35.6%
Tragic
30.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
23.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Pima Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 110.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 48.5%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.070%), female disability (14.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.39%), and disability (14.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 3.3%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Pima Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from the AzoresPima
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Tragic
38.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.9%
Tragic
55.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.8%