Immigrants from El Salvador vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,749,762 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from El Salvador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.586. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from El Salvador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from El Salvador corresponds to a decrease of 6.8 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Pima communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($81,213 compared to $63,262, a difference of 28.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,176 compared to $73,365, a difference of 27.0%), and per capita income ($38,394 compared to $30,644, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,673 compared to $35,326, a difference of 3.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,913 compared to $82,821, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,599 compared to $51,503, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Pima communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 68.5%), married-couple family poverty (6.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 68.5%), and family poverty (11.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 66.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.4%), single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 23.7%), and single female poverty (22.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 35.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 126.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 104.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 85.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 41.7%), births to unmarried women (36.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 41.3%), and married-couple households (44.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.49 compared to 3.75, a difference of 7.5%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 35.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 83.3%), bachelor's degree (31.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 34.9%), and master's degree (12.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (80.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.0%), 12th grade, no diploma (83.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and ged/equivalency (77.6% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 54.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 51.0%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.5%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.8%).