Osage vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,061,672 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.906. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 28.8 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,568 compared to $30,644, a difference of 29.1%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 28.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $73,365, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $82,821, a difference of 2.0%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $35,326, a difference of 2.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $50,539, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Pima communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 109.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 109.5%), and family poverty (9.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 88.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 16.2%), single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 18.3%), and single male poverty (16.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 140.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 112.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 104.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 31.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 12.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 68.8%), births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 60.5%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.0%), family households (63.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 62.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (33.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 42.4%), associate's degree (41.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 37.1%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 72.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 40.6%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (14.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 3.3%), female disability (14.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.6%).