Norwegian vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
Norwegian
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Norwegians
Pima
8,521
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
68th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in Norwegian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,165,716 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 3.9 Pima.
Norwegian vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,480 compared to $30,644, a difference of 45.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $73,365, a difference of 41.3%), and wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $51,503, a difference of 3.2%), median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $35,326, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,866 compared to $82,821, a difference of 17.0%).
Income Metric | Norwegian | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,480 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,144 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,084 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Good $46,865 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $55,965 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,802 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,127 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,866 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,682 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,104 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Norwegian vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 207.0%), family poverty (6.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 166.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 134.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 7.7%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 36.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 37.1%).
Poverty Metric | Norwegian | Pima |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Exceptional 6.9% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.0% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Fair 12.9% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Good 20.8% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.0% | Tragic 19.0% |
Norwegian vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 194.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 166.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 127.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Norwegian | Pima |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.9% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 11.7% |
Norwegian vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 35.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 14.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Norwegian | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.7% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.4% | Tragic 72.8% |
Norwegian vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 75.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 73.6%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.93%), family households (63.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Norwegian | Pima |
Family Households | Poor 63.9% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.5% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.08 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 50.2% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.3% | Tragic 51.5% |
Norwegian vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 119.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 20.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 8.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Norwegian | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.7% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 62.8% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Norwegian vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (37.5% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 61.5%), associate's degree (47.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 57.5%), and no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.51%).
Education Level Metric | Norwegian | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.3% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 95.2% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 94.0% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.5% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.4% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.7% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 47.6% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 37.5% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Tragic 1.3% |
Norwegian vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 71.7%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 62.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.63%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and male disability (12.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.4%).
Disability Metric | Norwegian | Pima |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.5% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.5% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.8% |